Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Environment. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

E20 Fuel Reduces Carbon Monoxide and Hydrocarbon Emissions in Automobiles

A new study by the Center for Integrated Manufacturing Studies at Rochester Institute of Technology indicates that the use of E20 fuel, which blends 20 percent ethanol with gasoline, reduces the tail pipe emissions of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, compared with traditional gasoline or E10 blends.

In addition, the research team found no measurable impact to vehicle drivability or maintenance in conventional internal combustion engines.


Monday, July 6, 2009

Al Franken Backs Ethanol

Minnesota Senator Al FrankenWith the disputed Minnesota senate seat finally decided, it's good to see that the incoming senator, Al Franken supports ethanol and renewable energy.

In this MN Post article, Franken shared his thoughts on the Climate Change bill and its strong ethanol components:
"What we're talking about here is the science of how ethanol affects our carbon footprint," Franken said. "The science to me tells me it helps. I've looked at this a lot, and it seems to me that ethanol already helps our carbon footprint and it's only getting more efficient in the way it's produced. Corn ethanol is a step on the way to cellulosic ethanol, which is also going to benefit Minnesota. I'm in the pro-ethanol camp."
The state of Minnesota has been a strong supporter of ethanol. This is not a new policy direction for Franken or for the state. On his campaign website, he states his support for renewable energy:
Today, I think we need a new “Apollo project” – this time to fundamentally change our energy policy and end our reliance on foreign oil.

The natural resources we have right here in Minnesota – not just corn and soybeans and biomass and wind, but innovation and creativity and brainpower – can lead to amazing breakthroughs if we commit to this undertaking.

This “Apollo project” should provide financial support for research into new forms of renewable energy and development of currently-identified sources to make them more efficient. Of course I’m talking about corn ethanol. But I’m also talking about cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels. I’m talking about solar power. And, especially here in Minnesota, I’m talking about wind power. We live in a windy state!
He goes on to write that through renewable energy, America can improve the environment, make the nation more secure and less dependent on foreign oil and also create high-tech, high-paying jobs in conservation and R&D.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Never Been on a Farm. And it Shows.

Last month we told you about EPA bureaucrat Margo Oge who testified before Congress that "It takes 64 acres for corn ethanol and over 400 acres for a gallon of biodiesel.”

She seemed like she's never stepped foot on a farm but was confidently testifying before congress on how much corn it takes to make ethanol.

As a leading EPA official, specifically the Director of Transportation and Air Quality, you'd think she'd know a bit more about what she's testifying about before congress.

Apparently not.

Maybe the urban legislators took her claims as facts. But ag legislators and farmers know better.

With a corn yield average of 151 bushels per acre, and each bushel weighing 56 pounds, her claim that it takes 64 acres to make one gallon of ethanol is just ridiculously uninformed. 541,184 pounds of corn to make just one gallon of ethanol?

The truth is that it takes less than three bushels per gallon and there's still value in the many co-products left from the ethanol production process.

Maybe she doesn't know where farms are located in America? Maybe she thinks food just magically shows up in her kitchen? Maybe she's never met a real farmer?

Senator Charles Grassley Iowa ethanol farm EPA
So to help her and her colleagues out, Senator Charles Grassley (IA) has announced that he's invited EPA bureaucrats to a real working farm to help them get a better understanding of American agriculture:
EPA has recently gone into four regulations that would be very detrimental to agriculture. And this one woman bureaucrat that -- and it's not because she's says woman -- it could be a man, too - never been on a farm. And can you imagine that? Doing all these things to harm agriculture and never been on a farm?

So we're bringing these people to Iowa in September the 3rd to -- to see a family farm and to visit an ethanol plant and to look to see what we're doing in agriculture.

Now, maybe we won't change their mind, but at least they won't be doing everything out of ignorance.
It should be a real eye-opener to these many desk-bound administrators on what it takes to feed and fuel America and the world.

Check out the video of her testimony. Her wild claims start at the 1 minute mark.





READ MORE
Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

Food and Fuel America.com
http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Waste Material to Power Ethanol Plant

Critics of renewable American biofuels like ethanol know that killing off corn ethanol now with junk science and wild theories would end the drive for any future cellulosic ethanol---fuels made from a variety of plants and waste materials.

Without the infrastructure and investments in today's ethanol, there can never be tomorrow's ethanol.

So it's good to see the industry moving forward with technology that continues to drive lower the costs and inputs for ethanol production. Ethanol is good today and it will be even better tomorrow.

POET ethanol corn cobs
POET, a leader in the ethanol industry, announced today that a self-sustaining energy cycle for producing cellulosic ethanol is close to reality with the recent startup of an anaerobic digester at POET’s pilot plant in Scotland, South Dakota.

corn cob harvest ethanol
Corn cobs at Project LIBERTY will not only be used to produce ethanol; the liquid waste will go to an anaerobic digester to power the cellulosic plant and offset natural gas usage at the attached grain ethanol plant as well. That’s renewable energy created at the plant, powering the plant and powering the adjacent facility.

POET installed and fired up its anaerobic digester, which was designed and built by Biothane, on May 20. The digester uses liquid waste created in the process of converting corn cobs to ethanol. That waste is used to produce methane gas, which acts as roughly the equivalent of natural gas.

"This technology will cut fossil fuels out of our cellulosic ethanol production process and further improve the benefits of grain-based ethanol," POET CEO Jeff Broin said. "Over the long term, POET would like to eliminate the use of fossil fuels at all of our plants through a variety of alternative energy sources." The alternative energy technologies employed at other POET facilities include a solid waste fuel boiler, landfill gas and cogeneration.
The digester is in the research phase - corn cobs have never been used in this way before. The methane is currently being flared, but once the process is refined, it will be installed as part of Project LIBERTY.

Project LIBERTY is a 25 million gallon-per-year cellulosic ethanol plant, which will be built in Emmetsburg, Iowa. Research and development work is on schedule for the plant to begin production in 2011.

Source: POET

Friday, June 5, 2009

Indirect Land Use: Science or Junk?

junk science indirect land use
If you go to the store and buy groceries, are you causing massive deforrestation somewhere in the world, increased greenhouse gases and contributing to global warming?

Many critics of biofuels have developed "scientific" models that support that argument.  And they've extended that model to any land that is used for food AND fuel such as ethanol.  Use some biofuels and you've wiped out a forrest, or so their theory goes.

But the scientific community is hardly convinced that this model is valid. Recently, a group of leading scientists submitted comments(pdf) regarding the indirect land use model developed by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).  The scientists called out two major issues:
  • The Science Is Far Too Limited and Uncertain For Regulatory Enforcement
  • Indirect Effects Are Often Misunderstood And Should Not Be Enforced Selectively
And renown author Robert Zubin also takes on the irrational Indirect Land Use analysis in a recent Roll Call article:  The Irreationality of Indirect Analsysis":
"the proper, scientific, ethical and sane way to proceed in assessing carbon emissions, whether of ethanol use or any other human activity, is to base such judgments strictly on the direct effects of the activity itself. These can be measured and therefore reduced in detail as technological alternatives permit. If we operate otherwise, then no constructive solutions will be possible."
Let's hope that in the rush to kill the renewable fuels, calmer heads will prevail.  

Because creating models against ethanol that includes biased assumptions only hampers our efforts to break free from the well-known dangers of foreign oil.

Source: Roll Call

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Study Shows Reducing Gasoline Emissions Will Benefit Human Health

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
A new study shows that a biofuel eliminating even 10-percent of current gasoline pollutant emissions would have a substantial impact on human health in this country, especially in urban areas.
“While the successful deployment of biofuels requires research to overcome technical barriers, there are other barriers that can often impose constraints more challenging than those related to technical feasibility, including constraints imposed by health risks,” says Thomas McKone, an expert on health risk assessments who holds a joint appointment with Berkeley Lab’s Environmental Energy Technologies Division and the University of California Berkeley’s School of Public Health. 

“Just think, if we had done a life cycle impact assessment on the human health effects of gasoline years ago we might not be in the situation we’re facing today.”

A grant from the Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI) has produced the comprehensive LCIA “Life Cycle Impact Assessment” to measure the benefits on human health that might result from a switch to biofuels.   EBI is a partnership between UC Berkeley, Berkeley Lab, the University of Illinois and BP, the energy corporation that has provided EBI with a 10-year $500-million grant.
“We found that for the vehicle operation phase of our LCIA, the annual health damages avoided in the U.S. with 10-percent less gasoline-run motor vehicle emissions ranges from about 5,000 to 20,000 DALY, with most of the damage resulting from primary fine particle emissions,” said McKone. “
This new study further confirms the mountain of evidence of the benefits of biofuels.

America needs to move from a gasoline-based transportation fuel for numerous reasons--environmental, economic, national security, and now, health.

Read more the study HERE

Monday, June 1, 2009

EPA Needs to Get Its Facts Right on Corn Ethanol

EPA Environmental Protection Agency corn ethanol acreIn the ongoing national debate about suspect calculations and assumptions created by the EPA to measure indirect land use for ethanol production, it's important that the EPA use sound science and real facts.

Just making up numbers to support a point of view is always a bad idea.

So it was very disheartening to see that wildly wrong information about corn ethanol seems to be flying around the EPA.

In testimony to House Small Business Committee Subcommittee, an EPA official (Office of Transportation and Air Quality) falsely testifies that it takes 64 acres of corn to produce one gallon of ethanol.

The truth is that every bushel of corn produces about about 3 gallons of ethanol.  And every acre produces on average over 150 bushels of corn.  And most importantly, every gallon of ethanol also produces valuable co-products like Dried Distillers Grains that remain highly nutritious as animal feed. Corn ethanol is both food AND fuel.

The EPA needs to get its facts right and not just make stuff up.






AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Food and Fuel America.com
http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

Friday, May 22, 2009

America's Energy Source Choice: Midwest or Middle East?

America Energy Source Midwest or Middle East
As Americans commemorate the ultimate sacrifice of American service personnel this holiday weekend, it reminds us of the tremendous cost that America continues to pay in blood, sweat, and billions of dollars to protect oil supplies around the world.  

America must continue to invest in domestic sources of energy.  And the simple reality is that we can move forward quickly with proven, earth-friendly technologies like bio fuels now.  Future technology discoveries will build upon the structure that is in place and growing now.

But it will all be lost if opponents get their way to label bio fuels as "unworkable",  "expensive", or "dirtier" than fossil fuels.

So this weekend, the choice remains.  Where should America get its energy?  

The Midwest or the Middle East?

Thursday, May 21, 2009

House Committee Reviews Proposals for Low Carbon Fuel Standards

The House Agriculture Committee today held a hearing to review proposals to implement low carbon fuel standards and efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on state and federal levels.

The Agriculture Committee heard testimony from representatives of four renewable fuel companies and organizations who expressed serious concerns about provisions in proposed low carbon fuel standards that put U.S. biofuel producers at a disadvantage.

Leading experts on the subject who testified included:

  • Mr. Brian Jennings, Executive Vice President, American Coalition for Ethanol, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
  • Mr. Tom Buis, Chief Executive Officer, Growth Energy, Washington, D.C.
  • Mr. Bob Dinneen, President and CEO, Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, D.C.
  • Mr. Carlos A. Riva, President and CEO, Verenium Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts

  • Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson also expressed concern over pending legislation and regulations:
    “I continue to be very concerned that some of the renewable fuel provisions under consideration on a state and national level are short on science and long on obstructive and excessive restrictions for domestically produced biofuels. The United States needs to have energy policies that are flexible, practical, and innovative.”
    Indeed, proposed regulations and calculations of indirect land use by the EPA have generated fierce opposition for being highly speculative and imperfect.

    Friday, May 15, 2009

    EPA Extends the Public Comment Period on E15 Ethanol Waiver Application

    EPA Ethanol E15 waiver applicationThe US EPA today announced they are extending the comment period for the E15 ethanol waiver application.

    The waiver request would allow higher blends of ethanol into the nation's fuel supply.  If you haven't done so already, let the EPA know how you feel about higher blends:

    The US EPA is currently taking comments from citizens regarding allowing high blends of ethanol.  Write to the EPA to let them know you support higher blends of ethanol! Currently, blends up to 10% are allowed (E10).  

    Via American Coalition for Ethanol (ACE)

    Via Growth Energy

    Via the National Corn Growers Association

    Source: EPA
    Follow Us --> Food and Fuel America on Twitter

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Thursday, May 14, 2009

    It's Time for Farmers to Take Back 'Sustainable'

    Ethanol critics continue to look for ways to confuse policymakers and the public in their continuing campaign of disinformation.  Over the years they've tried many tricks: saying it couldn't be done, saying it was too expensive and saying it raised food prices.  Now their trick is to say that modern farming practices aren't "sustainable".   But the facts always prove them wrong.  We saw this wonderful essay this week and thought it would add more thoughtful points to the food vs fuel discussion.  Reprinted by permission by the California Farm Bureau Federation.

    Troy Hadrick California Farm Bureau farmer sustainable
    It's time for farmers to take back "sustainable"
    By Troy Hadrick

    It's hard to get through the day anymore without hearing the word "sustainable." In fact, I was recently asked if I was a factory farmer or if I raised cattle sustainably. Who judges what's sustainable and what isn't? It seems that the word has been hijacked and is being used by people who are opposed to modern agriculture.

    Sometimes you just have to shake your head when you hear the term. When I hear about sustainable wood, it always puzzles me. Are there some trees that don't grow back?
    But in food production, we hear more and more that modern agriculture can't continue down the same path it's currently on. What exactly led to that false notion, and how would anyone possess the kind of knowledge needed to back up that sweeping statement?

    Skeptics say we should go back to how we used to raise crops and livestock. But how far back should we go? To the 1950s? Or how about the 1870s? Maybe we could go back to when everyone raised just their own food?

    Broadly, it is frequently true that so-called sustainable practices are those techniques used before the combustion engine was invented. Every industry has adapted and used technology to improve production methods and output. That includes agriculture.

    From a farmer's perspective, there are two questions that should have to be answered before any agricultural practice can truly be considered sustainable. First, will the farm and ranch families implementing the practice be able to generate enough income to continue farming or ranching? Will those families be sustainable? And second, will the practice help producers increase food production to keep up with a growing population? If the answer to either of these questions is no, then, from my perspective, it should not be considered sustainable.

    If farmers and ranchers can't make a living, they obviously won't be around very long. That's not what I would call a sustainable practice. Or if America's farmers and ranchers are forced to use production methods that do not yield enough food for everyone, would you consider that sustainable? I wouldn't.

    At the end of the day, agriculture has a single, yet vital, responsibility—to provide food, fiber, fuel and other basics of life for an ever-growing world. The agriculture industry that some folks like to envision is better described as nostalgic rather than sustainable or even realistic. Our society wouldn't have developed into what it is today if 25 percent or more of our workforce was still required to grow food. For the past century, we have continually produced more food with less farm inputs. With the technologies available today, that trend will continue.

    American agriculture has a longer track record than any other sector in this country. Many families are producing food on the same land their ancestors did. That is proof of sustainability. Farmers and ranchers know a thing or two about being sustainable since our livelihood depends on it. It's time we take our word "sustainable" back and encourage everyone to think about and use its real definition.

    (Troy Hadrick, a South Dakota rancher, is a member of the American Farm Bureau's Young Farmers and Ranchers Committee. He may be contacted at troyhad@gmail.com.)


    Follow Us --> Food and Fuel America on Twitter

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Saturday, July 5, 2008

    Scientists Counsel California to Regulate Low Carbon Fuel Standard on Hard Data Only

    California Low Carbon Fuel Standard biofuelsCiting a severe lack of hard empirical data, an assembly of scientists and researchers across the nation urged California to adopt a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) based on commonly understood direct impacts on carbon dioxide emissions and further study highly controversial and speculative "indirect land use changes" before incorporating any of these indirect impacts in that standard.

    In a letter sent to the Chair of the of the Air Resources Board, the scientists and researchers state:
    "Given that our only options for sustainably powering transportation with a significant reduction in transportation related greenhouse gas emissions are biofuels, batteries, and hydrogen, a presumptive policy implementation based on the current understanding of indirect impacts will have a significant chance to hurt real progress on reducing carbon emissions and decreasing our reliance on fossil fuels.

    We propose that a sound policy approach would be to base the initial LCFS on existing data sets that possess scientific consensus. These include the direct impacts of renewable biofuels production. The scientific and economic communities can then take advantage of the necessary time over the next five years to fully understand, gather, and validate the indirect impacts of biofuels production with empirical evidence that will enable the implementation of a sound policy that can address any indirect impacts."
    The scientists and researchers, signing on their own and not on behalf of their institutions, include scientists from Universities and National Laboratories across the nation. The full text of the letter is available HERE.

    Blake A. Simmons, Ph.D.
    Manager, Energy Systems Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA and Vice-President for Deconstruction, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA

    Jay D. Keasling, Ph.D.
    Professor, Departments of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA and Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA and Chief Executive Officer, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA

    Harvey Blanch, Ph.D.
    CSTO, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA and Merck Professor of Biochemical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Paul D. Adams, Ph.D.
    Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA

    Todd W. Lane, Ph.D.
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Christopher Shaddix, Ph.D.
    Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    William J. Orts, Ph.D.
    Research Leader, Bioproduct Chemistry & Engineering, USDA-ARS-WRRC, Albany, CA

    R. Michael Raab, Ph.D.
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, MA

    Brad Holmes, Ph.D.
    Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Rick Gustafson, Ph.D.
    Denman Professor of Bioresource, Science and Engineering, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

    Lonnie Ingram, Ph.D.
    Distinguished Professor of Microbiology, University of Florida and Director of the University of Florida Center for Renewable Chemicals and Fuels, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville, FL

    Mohammed Moniruzzaman, Ph.D.
    VP Research & Development, BioEnergy International, Quincy, MA

    Masood Hadi, Ph.D.
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    David Reichmuth, Ph.D.
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Swapnil Chhabra, Ph.D.
    Research Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA and Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA and Vice President for Technology, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA and Head, Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Berkeley, CA

    Bruce E. Dale, Ph.D.
    Distinguished University Professor, Dept. of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

    Charles E. Wyman, Ph.D.
    Ford Motor Company Chair in Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Research & Technology (CE-CERT), Riverside, CA and Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering University of California, Riverside, CA and Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH

    Stephen R. Kaffka, Ph.D.
    Co-Director, California Biomass Collaborative and Extension Agronomist, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA

    Mike Henson, Ph.D.
    University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

    Keith Kretz, Ph.D.
    VP, R&D Operations and Services, Verenium Corporation, San Diego, CA

    Jeffrey L. Blanchard, Ph.D.
    University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

    Randolph T. Hatch, Ph.D.
    President, Cerex, Inc., Wellesley, MA

    Susan Leschine, Ph.D.
    University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

    Ken Copenhaver
    Program Director, Institute for Technology Development, Savoy, IL

    Dean Dibble
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Seema Singh, Ph.D.
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Rajat Sapra, Ph.D.
    Member of the Technical Staff, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA

    Source: Yahoo PRNews

    READ MORE
    Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
    Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Wednesday, June 18, 2008

    Ethanol Plants Recognized for Energy Savings

    POET Biorefining ethanol plantThe US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recognized two ethanol facilities for reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

    ENERGY STAR awards were given to POET Biorefining in Ashton, Iowa, and East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC in Garnett, Kan., at the 24th annual International Fuel Ethanol Workshop and Expo in Nashville, Tenn.
    East Kansas Agri-Energy, ethanol facility
    "EPA is proud to recognize the outstanding pollution reduction and energy efficiency qualities of both ethanol facilities by presenting these ENERGY STAR Combined Heat and Power Awards. These facilities in Iowa and Kansas are making improvements that contribute to a cleaner and healthier environment," said EPA Region 7 Administrator John B. Askew.
    In April 2004, POET began full production at an ethanol plant in Ashton. Electricity is generated by a natural gas-fired turbine, which requires approximately 16 percent less fuel than typical on-site thermal generation and purchased electricity. Based on this comparison, the system reduces carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 18,900 tons per year, which is equivalent to removing the annual emissions from 3,100 cars or planting 3,900 acres of forest.
    "POET is dedicated to making the process of producing ethanol even more efficient and environmentally friendly, so it's an honor to be recognized by EPA for the environmental benefits of the efficiencies built into our Ashton plant," said POET CEO Jeff Broin.
    The East Kansas Agri-Energy dry mill ethanol plant in Garnett, Kan., began production in 2005. The steam turbine system generates approximately one-third of the facility's electrical demands. It requires approximately 23 percent less fuel than typical on-site thermal generation and purchased electricity. Based on this comparison, the plant reduces carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 14,500 tons per year, which is equivalent to removing the annual emissions from 2,400 cars or planting 3,000 acres of forest.
    "Our East Kansas Agri-Energy plant includes an energy-efficient system, which transforms a requirement to control air pollution into an opportunity to address the plant's energy demands," said Plant Manager Doug Sommer.
    Dry mill ethanol facilities require large-scale, constant electricity and thermal loads, making these facilities an excellent fit for this innovative technology. These highly efficient and economical systems can use a variety of fuels, including natural gas or biomass. They can also improve the overall environmental benefits of biofuels by reducing the greenhouse gases associated with ethanol production.

    The EPA's ENERGY STAR program recognizes projects that reduce emissions and use at least five percent less fuel than state-of-the-art, comparable separate heat and power generation.

    Source: EPA

    READ MORE
    Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
    Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Monday, June 9, 2008

    Ethanol vs Gasoline Experiment

    weird science ethanol vs gasolineInteresting experiment demonstrating the difference between burning ethanol and gasoline.




    -

    -
    If you can't see the video, click HERE.

    READ MORE
    Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
    Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Wednesday, April 23, 2008

    Ethanol Production Goes Green

    Argonne National Laboratory EthanolA new report on domestic ethanol production shows dramatic efficiency gains in the past five years.

    According to the analysis conducted by the Argonne National Laboratory, ethanol plants are using less energy and less water to make ethanol than just a few years ago.

    Other key report findings include:
    • Ethanol yield per bushel of corn increased 6.4% for dry mills and 2.4% for wet mills.
    • Total energy use (fossil and electricity) decreased 21.8% in dry mills and 7.2% in wet mills.
    • A decrease in grid electricity use in dry mills of 15.7%.
    • Finally, water consumption in dry mills decrease of 26.6%.

    The full report is available HERE (pdf).

    Source: Renewable Fuels Association, Argonne National Laboratory

    READ MORE
    Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
    Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Friday, April 18, 2008

    Tennessee Endorses 25x'25

    Tennessee SealThe Tennessee General Assembly last week became the 14th state legislative body to endorse the goal of a 25x'25 energy future.

    "25x'25" is a rallying cry for renewable energy and a goal for America – to get 25 percent of our energy from renewable resources like wind, solar, and biofuels by the year 2025.

    Prime sponsor, State Sen. Bill Ketron of Murfreesboro, and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Stratton Bone, were joined by 32 senators and 96 representatives in overwhelmingly adopting Senate Joint Resolution 728.

    The resolution promotes:
    "the development of a broad spectrum of renewable energy sources, including wind power, biodiesel, biomass, methane digesters, ethanol, and solar" for the direct economic benefit to agricultural landowners and rural communities.
    The measure also recognizes the state's and region's "tremendous renewable energy resources" and that this resource base will "allow America's farmers and ranchers to play a major role in ensuring a fully sustainable U.S. energy system."

    To learn more about Tennessee's Biofuel programs, visit www.biotenn.org

    The full Tennessee resolution can be found HERE in PDF format.

    Source: 25x'25

    READ MORE
    Never Miss a New Article--> Subscribe to updates by Email
    Find What You Seek --> Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!

    Wednesday, April 2, 2008

    25 x '25 Responds to Time Magazine

    Time magazine ethanol clean energy scamMore criticism of Time's slam towards biofuels is starting to show up online.

    The following response from the 25 x '25 organization.
    April 2, 2008

    25x'25 Responds to Time Magazine Biofuels Article with Letter to the Editor

    Responding to widespread inaccuracies in this week's Time magazine cover story, the 25x'25 National Steering Committee is responding with a letter to the editors of Time expressing disappointment with the questionable characterization of biofuels and their role in the issue of greenhouse gas emissions in "The Clean Energy Scam," by Michael Grunwald. The letter was authored by steering committee member and former Congressman Thomas W. Ewing, who is also the Immediate Past Chairman of the USDA and DOE Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee. The entire letter follows:

    As a former Member of Congress and a leader in a diverse alliance of agricultural, environmental and conservation organizations working together to advance clean energy solutions, I am greatly disturbed with Time magazine's April 7th feature story on biofuels. In this article, Michael Grunwald criticizes biofuels yet offers no alternative to using petroleum to meet our energy needs - much of which comes from the Middle East.

    Members of our alliance share the author's anxiety for the continued health of the Amazon rain forest and other "carbon sinks" that nature has provided around the globe. As champions of many forms of land-based renewable energy (biomass, wind energy, solar power, geothermal energy and hydropower, in addition to biofuels), we agree that environmentally sensitive lands should not be exploited in pursuit of renewable fuels.

    Unfortunately, the story's message of concern is undermined by misinformation about biofuels and an over-simplified analysis of complex systems. The implication that biofuel production is responsible for the destruction of the Amazon rain forest ignores the reality that ever increasing worldwide demand for food and fiber is the primary cause of land use change in this and other regions. Simply eliminating biofuels will not stop land use changes from occurring, and in countries like Haiti that have already lost their forests, biofuels could help reestablish forests and offer more affordable and sustainable energy options. Similarly, information in the story about a recent study, which claims land-use changes brought about by increased biofuel production are producing more greenhouse gas emissions (Searchinger et al.), only tells half the story. What is missing is that Searchinger's methodologies have been widely questioned by respected biofuel life-cycle analysis researchers such as Michael Wang, with the Center for Transportation Research at the Argonne National Laboratory, who counter that Searchinger et al. used outdated, if not incorrect, data to reach their conclusions.

    The story's reference to a UN food expert's dramatic condemnation of biofuel production fails to mention that the UN Food and Agriculture Organization almost immediately distanced itself from the remarks. The head of the UN Food Program recently noted that higher energy costs, erratic weather and low stocks are big factors contributing to the high cost of food around the globe.

    Of particular concern is the ready dismissal of emerging technologies that will allow us to produce next generation biofuels from non-food feedstocks sustainably grown on underutilized and marginal lands not suited for food production. Conservation tillage and other agriculture and forestry residue management practices used to produce biomass energy feedstocks can also provide a constant buildup of soil organic carbon. Researchers at Ohio State have concluded that the total potential of carbon sequestration in U.S. soils, counting croplands, grazing lands and woodlands, is nearly 600 million metric tons of carbon, or the equivalent of more than 2,200 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions - about 33 percent of total U.S. emissions.

    We encourage the editors of Time to contribute to a much-needed discussion of the role renewable resources will play in improving national security and the environment while moving us closer to energy independence. We simply ask that they demand a basic level of accuracy and balance from the stories that they run.

    For a full list of talking points relative to the Time article, CLICK HERE.
    Source: 25 x 25

    READ MORE
    Subscribe to updates by Email
    Search FoodandFuelAmerica.com

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    Food and Fuel America.com
    http://www.foodandfuelamerica.com

    Good and Balanced Food and Fuel News!